Abstract
Objective
The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to evaluate the relationship between leading follicle size at the time of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) trigger and live birth rates in Patient-Oriented Strategies Encompassing Individualised Oocyte Number (POSEIDON) groups 3 and 4 undergoing assisted reproductive technology cycles using a gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol. The objective was to identify the optimal leading follicle size for maximizing live birth outcomes in this challenging patient population.
Material and Methods
This retrospective cohort study included POSEIDON groups 3 and 4 poor responders aged 20-42 years undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection with GnRH antagonist protocol between January 2015 and July 2021. Patients were categorized based on the occurrence of premature ovulation. The primary outcome measures were number of oocytes retrieved, number of metaphase II (MII) oocytes, MII oocyte ratio and follicle oocyte index (FOI). These outcomes were compared across different leading follicle size categories at the time of hCG trigger.
Results
Among the 294 subjects included, 47 (16.2%) had premature ovulation between the trigger and oocyte pick-up days. The mean size of the leading follicle on the day of trigger was significantly higher in the premature ovulation group (19.8±2.4 mm vs.18.7±2 mm, respectively; p<0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analyses identified baseline luteinizing hormone [odds ratio (OR) 1.144, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.052-1.243; p=0.002], number of follicles >11 mm on the day of trigger (OR 0.580, 95% CI 0.438-0.767; p<0.001), and leading follicle size (OR 1.361, 95% CI 1.130-1.641; p=0.001) as independent predictors of premature ovulation. The FOI and MII/antral follicle count ratios peaked when the leading follicle size was between 16-17 mm.
Conclusion
Individualized triggering based on leading follicle size may provide optimal oocyte retrieval after ovarian stimulation in POSEIDON expected poor responders. While a late trigger may result in premature ovulation, an early trigger may also result in less MII. Triggering when the leading follicle size is between 16.5 and 17 mm may help to prevent these negative outcomes and achieve optimal cycle outcome.
Introduction
Poor ovarian responders (PORs) represent a major challenge when undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART), as they experience a poor fertility outcome, yield low number of oocytes, have an increased risk of premature ovulation and a greater likelihood of cycle cancellation, despite high-dose gonadotropin treatment (1). Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists are useful in PORs to suppress pituitary activity and prevent a premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surge during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS). However, despite GnRH antagonist administration, the occurrence of premature LH surge was reported in approximately 0.34-8.0% of patients (2-4). Cycle management for premature ovulation may involve attempting to retrieve all oocytes by aspirating the free fluid from the posterior cul-de-sac under transvaginal sonographic guidance or switching to intrauterine insemination (IUI) protocol when all follicles are ruptured (5, 6). Even with optimal convertion to IUI, these patients were 2.6 times less likely to have a live birth after IUI compared to in vitro fertilization (IVF) (7). When the larger follicles prematurely rupture before oocyte pick-up, the rate of harvesting metaphase II (MII) oocytes will decrease from the remaining smaller follicular pool. In addition, premature progesterone rise may lead to endometrial asynchrony, necessitating cryopreservation of the embryos (5, 6). All of these challenges are exacerbated by a scarcity of evidence regarding the ideal leading follicle diameter and the optimal timing for final oocyte maturation.
While some studies have claimed that follicle diameter of ≥16 mm leads to higher pregnancy rates because of optimized growth factors and steroid hormones in the follicular fluid (8-11), other studies have shown no differences between follicle size and embryo quality and/or implantation rate (12, 13). In ART cycles, the timing of trigger usually depends on the size of the leading follicle/s, which is generally accepted as >17-18 mm. Early implementation of trigger leads to an early LH surge, thus follicular atresia, and obtaining a lower number of mature oocytes (14). On the other hand, a delayed trigger carries the risk of premature ovulation and oocyte deterioration (14).
The Patient-Oriented Strategies Encompassing Individualised Oocyte Number (POSEIDON) group classification system was introduced to improve pregnancy rates (15). Several suggestions have been made to improve outcome for each sub-group. However, premature LH surge and premature ovulation still remain one of the main challenges, particularly in POSEIDON groups 3 and 4 poor responders. The relationship between the leading follicle size and the risk of premature ovulation and oocyte maturation rate is not yet clear. The aim of the present study was to determine the optimal size of the leading follicle before triggering final oocyte maturation in order to prevent premature ovulation and maximize the mature oocyte rate in POSEIDON groups 3,4.
Material and Methods
In this single-center, retrospective cohort study, data from women in POSEIDON groups 3 and 4 poor responders aged between 20-42 years who underwent intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) following a GnRH antagonist cycle between January 2015 and July 2021 were reviewed. The study protocol was approved by the Ankara University Ethical Committee for Human Research (approval number: I8-567-21, date: 15.10.2021). All included subjects fulfilled the POSEIDON criteria for the definition of expected POR; antral follicle count (AFC) <5 and/or serum anti-Müllerian hormone level <1.2 ng/mL (15). All data on COS were extracted from patient records and the hospital database, and cycles were categorized into two groups according to occurrence of premature ovulation. Premature ovulation was defined as visualization of rupture of at least one of the leading follicles on the day of oocyte retrieval.
The inclusion criteria were fulfilment of the criteria for POSEIDON groups 3 or 4, a starting dose of gonadotropin stimulation of 225-300 IU/day, and body mass index between 20 and 35 kg/m2. The exclusion criteria were the use of long agonist or natural cycle protocols, progestin-primed ovarian stimulation, presence of any untreated thyroid dysfunction, adrenal disease, or hyperprolactinemia, administration of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs to suppress ovulation or all the above factors.
Before initiation of treatment, all patients underwent vaginal ultrasound examination to eliminate presence of >10 mm follicles on day 2 of the cycle. Baseline hormonal profile was also assessed. Ovarian stimulation was carried out with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH) (Gonal-F; Merck-Serono, Geneva, Switzerland) and/or human menopausal gonadotropin (Menopur; Ferring GmbH, Wittland, Kiel, Germany) from the second or third day of the menstrual cycle with an initial dose of 225-300 IU/day. Dose adjustment was performed individually according to ovarian response, which was determined on the basis of serum estradiol levels and ultrasound examination. The maximum dose of rFSH was 375 IU/day. The GnRH antagonist Cetrorelix 0.25 mg/day (Cetrotide; Merck-Serono, Geneva, Switzerland) was initiated on day 6 of stimulation in a fixed manner. All oocyte retrieval procedures were performed under inhalation anaesthesia using a 16-gauge double-lumen oocyte retrieval needle under transvaginal ultrasound guidance 36 hours after the final oocyte trigger by recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin (Ovitrelle 250 micrograms, Merck Serono, Modugno, Italy). The timing of trigger related to the follicle size was performed based upon the experience and preference of the treating physician.
The primary outcome measures were number of oocytes retrieved, number of MII oocytes, MII oocyte ratio and follicle oocyte index (FOI). FOI was calculated as the ratio between the number of oocytes retrieved at oocyte pick-up and the number of antral follicles at the start of stimulation (16). MII oocyte ratios were calculated as MII/AFC and MII/follicles >11 mm on trigger day. In addition, the ratio of oocytes retrieved by number of follicles >11 mm on the day of final oocyte maturation was further calculated.
Statistical analysis
Data analysis was performed using SPSS, version 21.0 (IBM Inc., Armonk, NY, USA). Samples were tested with the Shapiro-Wilk test to determine normality of distribution. The results of this analysis meant that parametric tests were preferred. Continuous variables were compared with Student’s t-test and One-Way ANOVA test where appropriate. Categorical variables were compared with chi-square test. Multivariate logistic regression models were created to determine independent predictors of premature ovulation in POSEIDON groups 3 and 4 patients undergoing COS. A p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. In addition, assuming a non-linear relationship between maximal follicle size on the day of trigger and follicle output parameters, non-linear quadratic curve models are created to estimate the optimal time for triggering.
Results
A total of 456 POSEIDON patients assessed to be in groups 3 and 4 were assessed for eligibility. Among those, 342 patients between 20 and 42 years of age who underwent COS along with GnRH antagonist suppression were included. However, 12 patients were excluded due to untreated thyroid dysfunction or hyperprolactinemia, and 36 patients were excluded due to administration of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs before oocyte retrieval. Thus, 294 patients were included in the final analyses.
Four patients did not respond to COS and cycles were cancelled. Among those who were scheduled for oocyte retrieval, 47 (16.2%) had premature ovulation. Table 1 shows the comparisons between the patients who ovulated prematurely and the controls. In the premature ovulation group, serum FSH and LH levels were significantly higher and AFC was significantly lower when compared to controls (Table 1). The distribution of the POSEIDON groups was similar between the premature ovulation and control groups (p=0.512). The mean serum progesterone and LH levels on the day of hCG trigger were significantly higher in the premature ovulation group compared to control subjects (Table 1). The mean size of the leading follicle on the day of hCG trigger was significantly higher in the premature ovulation group than in the control group (19.8±2.4 mm vs. 18.7±2 mm, respectively; p<0.001). The mean number of follicles >11 mm on the day of hCG trigger was significantly lower in the premature ovulation group than in the control group (2.5±1.8 vs. 3.6±2, respectively; p<0.001).
The cycle outcome parameters in the study and control groups are summarized in Table 2. The mean number of oocytes retrieved and MII oocytes were significantly lower in the premature ovulation group, as well as the rates of oocytes retrieved/AFC, oocytes retrieved per total of >11 mm follicles, MII/AFC, and MII/>11 mm follicles than in the control subjects.
After adjusting for parameters that differed significantly between the premature ovulation cases and controls (baseline FSH, AFC), baseline LH, number of follicles >11 mm on the day of hCG trigger, and leading follicle size were identified as independent determinants for the probability of premature ovulation (Table 3). An increasing number of follicles >11 mm on the day of hCG trigger decreased the likelihood of premature ovulation [odds ratio (OR) 0.580, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.438-0.767; p<0.001]. Increasing size of the leading follicle on the day of hCG trigger increased the likelihood of premature ovulation (OR 1.361, 95% CI 1.130-1.641; p=0.001).
Figure 1 illustrates the distribution of premature ovulation among the different sizes of leading follicles on the day of hCG. Premature ovulation was observed when the leading follicle exceeded 16 mm: 10% between 16.1-17 mm, 16.9% between 17.1-18 mm, 25% between 18.1-19 mm, 15% between 19.1-20 mm, and 22.6% above 20 mm.
The FOI and the MII/AFC rate were significantly different between subgroups based on different leading follicle sizes (Table 4). The highest values of FOI, MII/AFC, oocytes retrieved />11 mm follicle, and MII/>11 mm follicle were observed when the leading follicle size was between 16.1-17 mm. Figures 2 and 3 show the non-linear curve estimates for the best outcome in terms of the number of oocytes and MII per AFC and retrieved oocyte and MII per >11 mm follicle. The FOI and MII/AFC rate peaked when the leading follicle sizes were 17.5 mm and 16.5 mm, respectively. In addition, the oocytes retrieved />11 mm follicle and MII/>11 mm follicle rates peaked when the leading follicle sizes were 17.5 mm and 16.0 mm, respectively.
Discussion
The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between the leading follicle size on the day of trigger and efficiency of ovarian stimulation cycle by means of premature ovulation rate and oocyte/AFC, MII/AFC ratios in POSEIDON groups 3/4 poor responders. Across the whole study cohort, 16.2% had premature ovulation defined as observing rupture of at least one follicle between trigger day and oocyte pick-up. There were no significant differences between the POSEIDON groups regarding premature ovulation rates. The baseline serum LH level, number of follicles >11 mm on trigger day and leading follicle size were independent predictors for premature ovulation. The optimal follicle diameter to collect MII oocytes at the maximum rate was 16.5-17 mm in POSEIDON 3/4 PORs.
During a COS cycle, a careful frequent measurement of follicles is important in order to obtain the maximum number of mature oocytes and blastocysts (17). Several previous studies have found a relationship between the size of follicles and oocyte maturity, and suggested leading follicle diameters should be between 18 and 24 mm before trigger to obtain optimal MII oocyte and blastocyst numbers (9, 10, 13, 18). Early follicular retrieval to avoid premature ovulation, particularly in patients with low ovarian reserve, can lead to inadequate maturation of the follicles and lower number of mature oocytes (13, 19). Rosen et al. (20) suggested that the chances of mature oocyte yield and fertilization rates were significantly lower for 16-18 mm follicles than >18 mm follicles in an unselected IVF population. Similarly, Shapiro et al. (11) have shown that retrieval of follicles 10-12.5 mm size during oocyte retrieval was associated with a significant reduction in the total and MII oocyte retrieval rate. In the same study, follicle size of 19-21.5 mm was associated with the best rates for MII oocytes. Hence, it may be reasonable to extend the duration of stimulation to have a larger follicular pool to obtain more viable embryos (12, 20, 21). However, patients with low ovarian reserve and/or advanced age have increased risk of premature ovulation, which may result in cycle cancellation (4, 11, 22, 23). Wu et al. (24) showed that an earlier hCG trigger when the leading follicle size was 16 mm and early oocyte retrieval prevents premature luteinization and improves the number and quality of embryos in women >43 years old.
Reichman et al. (3) investigated breakthrough LH surge in GnRH antagonist cycles and found that the risk of premature LH surge and ovulation increased with age in patients with diminished ovarian reserve. These authors found that baseline serum FSH and LH levels were similar between the groups. The largest diameter of two follicles were 17.6 mm and 15.2 mm when the LH surge started in patients who had premature ovulation (3). Our results were in partial agreement with Reichman et al. (3). In our study, higher baseline LH level was an independent risk factor for premature ovulation, which may be the result of investigating a specific population: POSEIDON expected poor responders. We also found that serum LH level on the day of trigger was significantly higher in the premature ovulation group. The mean LH level in this group was approximately 20 mIU/mL indicating the LH surge had already started. There appears to be a fine line between premature ovulation and collecting immature oocytes in poor responders. While infrequent monitoring and late trigger may result in premature ovulation, on the contrary early trigger may result in less MII. In addition, it seems that patients with high baseline LH levels warrant more careful monitoring. The number of follicles responsive to ovarian stimulation was another independent risk factor for premature ovulation in the present study. The fewer the number of follicles >11 mm on trigger day, the greater the risk of premature ovulation. This suggests that the management of POSEIDON expected PORs may be different depending on the ovarian reserve level.
Our results showed that the numbers of retrieved oocytes and MII oocytes were significantly lower in the premature ovulation group. In addition, considering that not all POSEIDON patients who were expected to have a poor response had a uniform ovarian reserve, we attempted to evaluate the ratio of oocytes and mature oocytes obtained per antral follicle rather than the number of oocytes. The non-linear curve estimates showed that the FOI and MII/AFC ratio peaked when the leading follicle sizes were 17.5 mm and 16.5 mm, respectively.
Wu et al. (24) observed that granulosa cell functions including gene expression related to gonadotropin activity, steroidogenesis and apoptosis were all significantly affected by age. These biological changes may imply that intrafollicular growth factors, rather than estrogen per follicle, cause premature ovulation when ovarian reserve is low. Our findings also support this hypothesis because the serum estradiol level per >11 mm follicle on the day of trigger was similar between the premature ovulation and control groups.
Study limitations
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to assess optimal leading follicle size in POSEIDON groups 3 and 4. Despite the relatively small sample size and retrospective nature of the analyses, the main limitations of our work, the systematic exploration of individual parameters, the consistency in observed associations between leading follicle size and mature oocyte ratio together with the multivariate approach to identify premature ovulation risk factors add credence to our observations. Another limitation was the lack of information about embryo qualities and pregnancy outcomes. However, in our clinical practice, the collected oocytes are incubated together and following ICSI individual MII oocytes are not labelled. Therefore, it was not possible to evaluate the fertilization potential of oocytes and embryo quality according to follicle size.
Conclusion
The leading follicle size was an important parameter in deciding the timing of final oocyte maturation in POSEIDON groups 3 and 4 PORs. Individualized triggers based on leading follicle size may provide maximum efficiency in ovarian stimulation in POSEIDON expected PORs. While late trigger may result in premature ovulation, early trigger may also result in a lower MII output. Triggering when the leading follicle size is between 16.5 and 17 mm may help to prevent these unwanted consequences and achieve the optimum cycle outcome. However, randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm our results and to assess the relationship between leading follicle size and embryo quality in POSEIDON group 3 and 4 PORs.